That's the title of one of Linda Stamato's blog entries last Friday on NJ Voices. She talks about how the State of NJ is not doing anything to deal with the large numbers of foreclosures we're seeing while other cities and states are acting.

And in a previous blog entry of hers she highlights some examples of what other states are doing and suggests NJ needs to take similar action to provide immediate relief.

But, we continue to wait for action in New Jersey. As state agencies and court officials "plan and consider" what, if any, actions to take, citizen action groups, counselors, public interest lawyers and coalitions of citizens and activists are trying to fill the void.

...

Why are other states in advance of New Jersey? The experience with the farm crisis that swept across the country in the 1980s-- that led to a successful use of mediation of troubled farm loans--provides one answer. Farmer-creditor mediation brought debt-burdened farmers and their creditors together to resolve loan problems before they reached the point at which the only options were foreclosure or legal action.

I take issue with these types of calls to action to fix the crisis and try and blame local and state governments for fumbling around while people are losing their homes and banks are failing. I don't mean to single out Linda Stamato, since there are others making similar statements. The reason I take issue with these statements is because years ago, some states and local governments, foresaw the problems with predatory lending practices and tried to put a stop to it years ago. Imagine a guy goes to the doctor. The doctor tells him he needs to start excersising more and eat better or he's going to have serious health problems. The guy doesn't heed his doctors warnings and with all the pressure from the fast food industry, his health slowly starts to decline. Years later, he goes back to the doctor who diagnoses the patient with life threatening ailments that would require a heavy regiment to even hope to correct. Now, you can have sympathy for the patient, who is now finaly trying to come to terms with his own mortality, but can you really criticize the doctor for "fiddling" around while his patient is dieing? I wouldn't. The doctor tried to head off the problem when it was still manageable. Now that the problem has compounded itself, it is more difficult to treat.

This Slate.com artile describes how in 2002 Georgia became the first state to enact laws against predatory lending that slowed down some of the practices that caused the current problem and how the federal government stepped in on behalf of the lenders and investment banks. Other states followed Georgia's lead. The "New Jersey Home Ownership Security Act of 2002" was our state's response. From the first paragraph in the Act we read (emphasis added):

Abusive mortgage lending has become an increasing problem in this State, exacerbating the loss of equity in homes and causing an increase in the number of foreclosures in recent years. One of the most common forms of abusive lending is the making of loans that are equity-based, rather than income-based. The financing of points and fees in these loans provides immediate income to the originator and encourages the repeated refinancing of home loans. The lender's ability to sell loans reduces the incentive to ensure that the homeowner can afford the payments of the loan. As long as there is sufficient equity in the home, an abusive lender benefits even if the borrower is unable to make the payments and is forced to refinance. In addition, the financing of high points and fees causes the loss of precious equity in each refinancing and often leads to foreclosure.

The act covers a variety of problems that led us down the path we are now including high cost loans and flipping. The FHA had even seen signs fo lenders artificially inflating house prices as early as 2001 and worked on rules to stop them. They didn't seem to be effective or they were allowed to be ignored. The rules were also recently suspended to help banks deal with the large number of foreclosures they are seeing.

So what happened with that legislation? As you can see from the Slate article, the Treasury Department's Office of the Comptroller of Currency stepped in at the request of the banks. Here's a quote from Slate's article:

While the banks' legal arguments were thin, the OCC issued regulations in early 2004 nullifying the state laws as they applied to national banks. In part, the OCC reasoned that the states just got it wrong: As the then-comptroller explained in a speech to the Federalist Society, "We know that it's possible to deal effectively with predatory lending without putting impediments in the way of those who provide access to legitimate subprime credit." With the state laws nullified, national banks were free to engage in the sharp practices the states were hoping to stamp out. (Indeed, Georgia scuttled its law because it didn't want to give national banks a competitive advantage over its state institutions.) Facing intense pressure from subprime lenders and Wall Street, and left without a real chance of holding investors responsible for purchasing ill-advised loans, state legislatures gave up.

The mortgage markets and banks did this to themselves and made billions of dollars in profits along the way. Both from borrowers and investors. Now they're feeling the pain and expecting the Fed and State governments to come to their rescues, just like a spoiled kid that doesn't listen to his parents and then when he gets jammed up expects mom and dad to come running to his rescue.

I'm not saying that we don't need to do anything, but lets not allow our sympathy for the millions of Americans losing their homes and jobs to do things that will only feed money back up the chain to protect the people behind this mess and allow them to collect their multi-million dollar bonuses at our expense.

Related Links:



Comments:

Hi Tom: I like your essay and appreciate your comments on mine at NJ Voices.... It is a complicated business, that's for sure.

The number of instances in which law and policy decisions could have prevented a fiasco is just mind-boggling.... The savings and loan scandals....now freddie mac and fannie mae.....and beyond.....the regulatory-free environment in general is part of the picture, as one thinks about it....meaning not just financial issues but transportation, consumer products and on and on.... Eventually someone pays... The job for those of us who pay attention is to try to get action that prevents the fiasco we see coming. I wish we were more successful than we appear to be. It's not only that we need "government", we need good government and we don't get it when we need it most.... Linda

Posted by Linda Stamato on August 07, 2008 at 12:48 PM EDT #

Thank you for commenting. The way I see it, after the Great Depression, to give Americans confidence in the banking system, the FDIC was formed to insure deposits. Eventually mortgages and other loans started becoming federally insured.

All of this was because the banks took excessive risks and created a large amount of consumer and commercial debt that all came crashing down.

The Fed also had to pump some money into financial institutions. As a result of all the federal (i.e. taxpayer) money involved and put at risk, regulations were put in place to try and keep banks from making the same mistakes.

Recently, some of those regulations were repealed. When states tried to enact legislation to try and disuade the investment banks risky behavior, the federal government stepped in to allow them to keep on taking risks.

The main problem I have with all this, is that I thought we had determined that, left to their own devices, the banking industry would run amok like they did before the Great Depression. That was bad then, now that they're playing games with federally insured money, there is very little downside to them.

If they don't want regulation, that's fine. But that should mean they are on their own, without the safety net of tax payer money. If they want the safety net, they have to abide by regulations. Unfortunately, everyone involved screwed up royally.

After the S&L problems, we should have kept a closer eye on the banks.

Congress helped the GSE's buy some more subprime loans last year and look at where they are now. Calculated Risk has some http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/08/2007-vintage-mortgages.html">charts that show the percentage of high LTV mortgages. In 2007 there was a spike. It looks to me like some bad loans were funneled into the GSE's to help out the banks.

The amount of "mistakes" make me think there's more to it than just incompetence.

Posted by Tom on August 08, 2008 at 08:52 PM EDT #

I agree. The quantity and scope of the mistakes, while exacerbated by the fall in housing prices, are unlikely to have occurred through mere incompetence. Some folks, both hedging and directing, made money at the expense of others, aided and abetted by the intentional (and probably unintentional) actions of those in positions to make it possible for a select group to 'win' and 'win big' while celebrating the virtues of a free market system.....and, now, the fall-out, and enormous cost, from the operation of that "free system" will shift to the public.... I guess it's not such a free system after all, not, of course, when it fails.

Posted by Linda Stamato on August 11, 2008 at 11:49 AM EDT #

The scope of the mistakes weren't exacerbated by the fall in housing prices. The fall in housing prices was caused by the mistakes that caused housing prices to become artificially inflated. The correction of housing prices is a good thing, just like after you're sick, your temperature starts to fall back to normal.


I think we were completely failed by the legislation that was initially set up to protect us and instead was ignored to benefit certain sectors at the expense of the rest of the economy.


Things need to be done about it.

Posted by Tom on August 17, 2008 at 04:08 PM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: Allowed
[This is a Roller site]
« January 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
       
Today

Recent Posts

  • 2009 To Set New Foreclosure Auction Records

    January 05, 2009

    Because of the holidays, it seems that many foreclosure auctions in Bergen County were pushed back, with only a little more than 100 auctions scheduled for November and December 2008 combined. About…
  • The Housing Market was a Ponzi Scheme

    December 23, 2008

    Or at the very least behaved like one. You know what they say, if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's likely a duck. I've covered some of these topics earlier but want…
  • Realtor mouthpiece admits to positive spin

    December 22, 2008

    Thanks to grim over at njrereport.com for putting together a comprehensive post regarding David Lereah's spin during the real estate bubble. The post provides a good collection of articles of…
  • NY Metro not in worst 10 real estate forecast

    December 22, 2008

    CNNMoney.com has a list the 10 worst real estate market projections for the top 100 real estate markets. Eight of the top ten markets are in CA. It's surprising that the NY Metro area, which…
  • 37% of modified mortgages defaulting

    December 22, 2008

    I've discussed the lack of success people were having with getting their mortgage modifications in past posts. Either because the banks aren't willing to renegotiate a mortgage with terms that…
  • No Hope For Homeowners

    December 17, 2008

    Today, more news on the failure of the Housing Rescue Bill to help homeowners that are having trouble paying their mortgages and possibly facing foreclosure. The three-year…
  • It was never about affordability and homeownership

    December 17, 2008

    Many of the bad decisions made by our government that allowed banks to run wild and create the housing bubble were done under the auspices of making housing more affordable and increasing…
  • Thoughts on the Big 3 Bailout

    December 12, 2008

    I have mixed feelings about the bailout the auto industry wants. First, trillions of dollars have been pumped into the financial sector to free up credit. That should have been enough for the private…
  • NJ Courts work on foreclosure program for veterans

    December 12, 2008

    A story in the Star Ledger today describes a program being instituted by the state courts to aid veterans facing foreclosure . Under the program, the courts will require mediation in all cases…
  • November Foreclosures decline may be misleading

    December 11, 2008

    Dan Levy of Bloomberg is reporting on RealtyTrac's November foreclosure data . According to RealtyTrac, foreclosure activity fell 7% in October compared to November, but is still 28% compared to a…